skip to the content

ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA in combination with

MTX is effective in reducing signs and

symptoms in DMARD-IR patients

Phase III Clinical Trials

Proven Efficacy in RA Patients with an Inadequate Response to DMARDs: The OPTION Study

ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA treatment induced rapid improvements in signs and symptoms of RA, as early as 2 weeks after initiation

  • Significantly higher ACR responses at Week 24 were seen in patients treated with ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA plus MTX versus the comparator arm.
  • Significantly more patients randomised to ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA achieved ACR remission (ACR70 response) and DAS28 remission (<2.6) at Week 24 versus the comparator arm.
  • Patients treated with ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA responded as early as 2 weeks after therapy initiation; DAS28 decreased rapidly following initiation of ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA treatment, with the mean improvement corresponding to at least moderate EULAR response at the first assessed time point of 2 weeks.
Key efficacy results at Week 24 in the OPTION study
Parameter Placebo plus
MTX
n=204
ACTEMRA/
RoACTEMRA
8 mg/kg
plus MTX
n=205
ACR20 (primary endpoint) 26 59***
ACR50 11 44***
ACR70 2 22***
DAS28 remission 0.8 27***
Mean change in CRP level, mg/dl –0.35 –2.51***
Mean change in haemoglobin level, g/dl 0.03 1.24***
Change from baseline in HAQ–DI score of ≥0.3 47 59
Mean change in HAQ–DI score –0.34 –0.55**
Mean change in FACIT−Fatigue score 4.0 8.6***

**P<0.001; ***P<0.0001 vs. control group.

Data are percentage of patients except where indicated.

 
 
  • Patients in the ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA 8 mg/kg plus MTX arm also had greater improvements in CRP levels that appeared within 2 weeks of the first infusion and were maintained throughout the study, as well as rapid improvements in physical function (HAQ-DI score) and fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue score).

Rapid improvements in physical function and fatigue levels with ACTEMRA/RoACTEMRA

The design of the OPTION study and a summary of baseline characteristics of participants can be found in the Phase III Trials section of the website.

Reference:
Smolen JS, et al. Lancet 2008; 371:987–997.
Figures and tables reproduced from the Lancet © 2008, with permission from Elsevier.